# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer

PRIMARY SOURCES

ON COPYRIGHT

(1450-1900)

Gay v. Read, London (1729)

Source: The National Archives: c.33 351/305

Citation:
Gay v. Read, London (1729), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 1 of 1 total



No Translation available.


Johem Gay ar quer Robtu Walker Jacobu Watson Jovis 12o Junij
Jacobu Read Tho Read Sam Aris Edru Simons Upon Mocion this day made unto the Court by Mr Lutwich & Mr
Johem Noon Daniel Midwinter Robtu Willock Tho Shirley being of the Plaintiffs Counsel It was alleged that the Plaintiff being the Sole Author
Worrall Tho Woodward Jacobu Crokat Edmd Curll & proprietor of of [sic] a play entitled Polly an Oppera being the 2d parte
Hen. Curll Josephu Pole Fransu Jeffryes Henric of the Beggars Oppera did cause the said Book to be printed at
Witteridge & Anna Dod vid Defendants his own Expence in 4to for his own benefit as expressed on the
title page of the said Book and on or about the 3d day of April last the Plaintiff did cause the title to the Copy of the said Book to be
Entred in the Register Book of the Company of Stacioners according to the Statute in that case made & provided & afterwards
published the same That the Plaintiff hath not sold or contracted with any person or persons whatsoever to sell the property of the
said Book or any share therein notwithstanding which the Defendants after the said Book was published as aforesaid did
print reprint or publish or sell or cause to be printed reprinted published or sold contrary to the intent
of the said Act of Parliament the said Book of other Editions in 8vo without the Plaintiffs Consent whereby the Plaintiff hath
been greatly damnified in the sale of the Edition of the said Booke so by him printed & published as aforesaid
all which by Affidavits appeared and to be relieved in the mres aforesaid the Plaintiff hath exhibited his bill in this Court as by
certificat likewise appears and therefore it was prayed that an Injuncion may be awarded against the said Defendants to stay them &
every of them their Agents Servants & workmen from printing reprinted selling or publishing of the said Book
Intitled Polly an Oppera in any other Edition than what is the Plaintiffs own untill the said Defendants shal answer the
Plaintiffs bill & this Court take other order to the contrary which upon reading an Affidavit of the said Plaintiff an Affidavit of
Thomas Trout & others & the Affidavit of Wm Coles is ordered accordingly.



    


Copyright History resource developed in partnership with:


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK