# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
Le Chapelier's report, Paris (1791)

Source: N/A

Citation:
Le Chapelier's report, Paris (1791), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 4 of 23 total




5


general law on Performances [Spectacles], on the property of Authors, & on the duration which it
must have: finally it is necessary, since the matter presents itself, that you make some
legislative dispositions on the Performance police.
      The Authors of dramatic works had to, as much & more than all writers, be
free in their choice of who represent their works & in the expression of their thoughts.
      The public had to have the property of these masterpieces, which, more &
better than the conquests of Louis XIV, have illuminated his reign; & each have to be
master to seize the immortal works of Molière & of Racine, to try to bring out its
beauty & to have them acknowledged.
      But the despotism which tarnishes [flétrissoit] everything, which casts its eyes
on all institutions in order to control them, has invaded this communal property, & has
made it into an exclusive privilege.
      That was not surprising, since a vicious administration had transformed
everything into privileges, & that its unique system seemed to be to damage the rights
of all in order to serve the interests of some individuals, since the inquisition of the
tyranny was placed right alongside talent & thinking in order to choke the one &
hamper the other.
      But what must be surprising is that there was a small aggregation of men
which still considered themselves to be owners of a privilege which gave them the
exclusive property of the works of all dramatic authors


    


No Transcription available.

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK