Pope v Curl: Entry from the Court's Book of Orders, London (1741)

Source: The National Archives: c.33 376/350

Citation:
Pope v Curl: Entry from the Court's Book of Orders, London (1741), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1741d

Permanent link: https://copyrighthistory.org/cam/tools/request/showRecord.php?id=record_uk_1741d

Full title:
Pope v Curl: Entry from the Court of Chancery's Book of Orders

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1741a

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1741: Pope v. Curl
1741: Pope's Bill of Complaint, and Curl's Answer

Author: N/A

Publisher: Unpublished

Year: 1741

Location: London

Language: English

Source: The National Archives: c.33 376/350

Persons referred to:
Arbuthnot, John
Atterbury, Francis
Bolingbroke, Henry St John, 1st Viscount
Curl, Edmund
Douglas, Catherine
Douglas, Charles, 3rd Duke of Queensberry
Gay, John
Mansfield, William Murray, 1st Earl
Pope, Alexander
Swift, Jonathan
Wotton, William

Places referred to:
Ireland

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
Court of Chancery

Legislation:
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19

Keywords:
authorship, legal concept of
letters

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley

Our Partners

Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK