PRIMARY SOURCES

ON COPYRIGHT

(1450-1900)

Court of Cassation on artistic property, Paris (1841)

Source: N/A

Citation:
Court of Cassation on artistic property, Paris (1841), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

1 translated page

Chapter 1 Page 2



COURT OF CASSATION.                                          323


[2nd column:]

[...]

DECISION (after deliberation in the council chamber)

THE COURT; - In view of articles 1 and 2 of the law of 19 July 1793 regulating the
rights of authors and painters;
      Whereas the special law, namely that of 19 July 1793, regulates the rights
of authors and painters; and it is stated in the 1st article of this law that painters
and draughtsmen who produce pictures or drawings shall enjoy throughout their entire
life the exclusive right to sell, authorize for sale and distribute their works in
the territory of the Republic, and to transfer that property in full or in part;
      And this law thus establishes in principle that the sale of a painting does not
take away the right to reproduce it by a different art, namely that of engraving,
unless the painter has transferred this right by a specific contractual stipulation;
      Whereas it is evident, in actual fact, from the contested decision, that
Baron Gros did transfer to M. Vallot the right to engrave his painting La
Bataille des Pyramides
; and, consequently, nobody else but M. Vallot
could, without the latter's authorisation, engrave this painting;
      And it was the same for those additions which were made later on, in regard
of which Mme Dufresne, whose status as a wife sharing in her husband Baron Gros's goods,
and in the usufruct of these goods, has been disputed by no one, held the same rights
as Baron Gros would have had himself, in particular the right of engraving, which
neither of the two had transferred to anyone;
      And, this notwithstanding, M. Gavard has published an engraving containing the
original painting [le tableau primitif], as well as the additions made to it, without
having obtained permission for this, either from M. Vallot or from Baroness Gros;
      And he therefore incurred the penalties which are applicable to counterfeiters,
in spite of which the contested decision discharged him from this indictment, on the
grounds that the sale of a painting must necessarily entail the transfer of the right
of engraving it; so for this reason the said decision has violated art. 1 of the law
of 19 July 1793 and art. 425 of the Code pénal; - Overturn the decision.
      Done on 23 July 1841 – Criminal Chamber – M. de Crouseilhes, f.f. depr. –
M. Romiguières, Reporter – M. Delapalme, Attorney General – Messrs Nachet and Scribe,
lawyers.

_______________





Translation by: Freya Baetens (p. 2)

    


Copyright History resource developed in partnership with:


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

With the exception of commentaries that are available under a CC-BY licence (compliant with UKRI policy) you may not publish individual documents or parts of the database for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK