Commentary on:
Electoral Saxon Printing and Censorship Acts from 1549 to 1717 (1724)

Back | Commentary info | Commentary
Printer friendly version
Creative Commons License
This work by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900)

Identifier: d_1549


Electoral Saxon Printing and Censorship Acts from 1549 to 1717

Friedemann Kawohl

Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management, Bournemouth University, UK


Please cite as:
Kawohl, F. (2008) ‘Commentary on Saxonian printing and censorship acts from 1549 to 1717', in Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer,


1. Full title

2. Abstract

3. References


1. Full title

Electoral Saxon Printing and Censorship Acts of 1549, 1562, 1571, 1609, 1620, 1625, 1636, 1661, 1678, 1683, 1686, 1702, 1711, 1717 as published in 1724.


2. Abstract

These thirteen mandates are concerned with censorship, guild regulations and reprinting. Publishers were advised to refrain from printing "slanderous writings" (1549), "infamous" (1683, 1702) or "defamatory works" (1571), and admonished that "nothing may be printed nor imported from elsewhere without having first passed the censorship" (1562, 1620). Censors were required "to sign their names" (1661) and printers to "pledge themselves under oath" to not print anonymous writings (1711). Bookbinders and other non-professionals were banned from the book trade (1678) and the Leipzig City Court was ordered to strictly enforce Electoral book privileges (1636).


In 1625 the clarification was made that book privileges were not "issued in perpetuity" and in 1686 (in a mandate that was by and large copied from the Emperor's decree of 25 October 1685) it was stated that publishers were "to refrain from illicit reprinting which causes great harm to those who have honestly acquired books from their authors and who may well have obtained privileges for them". This wording was interpreted as a general ban of reprinting for both privileged and not-privileged books within a Rescript of 1798. However, this retrospective interpretation is not borne out by the practice of publishers and booksellers in Saxony over the course of the eighteenth century.



3. References


Books and articles [in alphabetical order]

Gieseke, L. Vom Privileg zum Urheberrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1995)

Kapp, F. Geschichte des Deutschen Buchhandels, vol.1 (Leipzig: Verlag des Börsenvereins der deutschen Buchhändler, 1886)


Our Partners

Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK