# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer

PRIMARY SOURCES

ON COPYRIGHT

(1450-1900)

Rescript on Post-Publication Censorship, Copenhagen (1773)

Source: Kongelige Rescripter, Resolutioner og Collegialbreve for Danmark og Norge, 6:1: 1766-1776, Gyldendal, 1786.

Citation:
Rescript on Post-Publication Censorship, Copenhagen (1773), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

2 translated pages

Chapter 1 Page 1


1733, Royal edicts

20 October

Edict (to the Chief of Police in Copenhagen) that nothing concerning the state and government, public measures, writings concerning physical confrontation, especially when a person




Chapter 1 Page 2


has been assaulted, town rumours and other indecent stories may be printed in the weekly papers.

The King has noted with great consternation that, despite repeated reprimands and prohibitions to the contrary, such revelations and news often appear in the reports of the Chamber of Deputies, in newspapers and other periodicals. Not only are they inappropriate for such publications, but they also reveal the bad intentions of the author and his lack of knowledge and insight into the matters dealt with. In order to prevent this, it is hereby ordered:

The Chief of Police shall, with the utmost seriousness, announce and make clear to the Adressecontoir of Notices and Newspapers (Adresse-Contoirets Efterretninger og Aviserne), as well as to other weeklies in Copenhagen, that they must absolutely not contain anything that is not in accordance with the associated privileges. Specifically, they must not contain anything dealing about the state and government, public measures, or writings about physical confrontations, especially when a person has been assaulted. Furthermore, they must not include town rumours or other invented stories that contain offensive and distasteful material, etc. In the case of gross negligence, the offender will be held solely responsible and the Chief of Police will immediately impose a fine of between 50 and 200 riksdaler, depending on the nature of the offence. This fine must be paid immediately, without appeal, and if payment is not made, the person will be punished according to the decree of December 1743.




Translation by: Mersiha Bruncevic

    


Copyright History resource developed in partnership with:


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK