# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer

PRIMARY SOURCES

ON COPYRIGHT

(1450-1900)

Supreme Court on Artistic Copyright, Madrid (1872)

Source: Archivo del Tribunal Supremo

Citation:
Supreme Court on Artistic Copyright, Madrid (1872), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 5 of 6 total



      
            
      it cannot be said that he committed the fraud alleged.
      
      
      Therefore, this Chamber, having considered
      the proven facts and declared that they do not
      constitute a crime, acquits Mr. Genovés since a mistake
      under paragraph two of art 4 of the law on Criminal Cassation
      or a violation of art. 552 of the Penal Code
      was not committed.
      
      
      We hereby declare and should declare that
      there is no cause for a cassation appeal for any violation
      lodged against the judgment of the Criminal Court of Valencia
      published on 30 March last. We hereby order the appellant
      Mr. Pedro Luis Bru to pay the legal costs.
      Therefore, this is our judgment that shall be published in the
      Madrid Gazette and
      

    


      
      de entenderse que ha cometido la defrauda-
      cion que se ha denunciado.
      
      Considerando por consiguiente que al
      apreciar la sala sentenciadora los hechos ad-
      mitidos como probados en su sentencia, decla-
      rando que no constituyen delito y absol-
      viendo libremente al Genovés no ha cometido
      error comprendido en el caso segundo del
      artículo cuarto de la ley de casación criminal
      ni infringido el artículo quinientos cincuenta
      y dos del Código Penal.
      
      Fallamos que debemos declarar y
      declaramos no haber lugar al recurso de ca-
      sación por infracción interpuesta contra
      la sentencia de la sala de lo criminal de
      la Audiencia de Valencia y publicada en
      treinta de de marzo último y condenamos en
      costas al recurrente D. Pedro Luis Brú.
      Así por esta nuestra sentencia que se
      publicará en la Gaceta de Madrid e inser-

    


Copyright History resource developed in partnership with:


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK